This case presents three questions:

(1) Spokeo v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016) and TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021) that an injury-in-fact analysis for Article III standing to a harm traditionally recognized at common law, and to evaluate the.

(2) actionable, downstream consequences of the alleged harms pled in the Ms

(3) Whether the Eighth Circuit decision that all emotional injuries are insufficient to establish standing is consistent with case-by-case approach in TransUnion and Spokeo.

Whether the Eighth Circuit's approach to Article III standing for emotional injuries is consistent with the case-by-case analysis in Spokeo and TransUnion