No. 24-7192
Carlos Ray Kidd v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: None
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-06-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. Whether a criminal defendant who suffers inordinate delay in sentencing is protected by the Fifth Amendment right to due process under this Court’s precedent in Barker v. Wingo or United States v. Lovasco? II. Whether prejudice may be presumed when there is an egregious delay in sentencing and, if not, what constitutes prejudice in a post -conviction context?
Docket Entries
2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-05-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-05-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent