No. 24-7193
Steven Douglas Rockett v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process duplicitous-charge indictment-dismissal ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-06-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court err in concluding that petitioner received effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment when petitioner's trial counsel failed to move to dismiss count 1 of his indictment as being vague and duplicitous?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Did the district court err in concluding that petitioner received effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment when petitioner’s trial counsel failed to move to dismiss count 1 of his indictment as being vague and duplicitous?
Docket Entries
2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-05-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-05-13
Amended Proof of Service of Steven Rockett submitted.
2025-05-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2025)
Attorneys
Steven Rockett
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent