No. 24-7205

Oscar Pliego-Pineda v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-05-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure evidence-standard federal-sentencing-guidelines leadership-role sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-06-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Leadership Sentencing Enhancement Is Erroneous Without Evidence That a Defendant Supervised any Specific Individual

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

I. Whether a Leadership Sentencing Enhancement Is Erroneous Without Evidence That a Defendant Supervised any Specific Individual.

Docket Entries

2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-05-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
Main Document
2025-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2025-05-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 13, 2025)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Oscar Pliego-Pineda
Seth Allen Neyhart — Law Office of Seth A. Neyhart, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent