No. 24-7213

Edward Magruder v. United States

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2025-05-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure fourth-amendment probable-cause search-incident-to-arrest warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-06-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourth Amendment's 'search incident to arrest' exception permits a warrantless search anytime agents had probable cause to believe that a defendant had committed some arrestable offense -even when agents had made no arrest, and were not already going to make one, before the search

Question Presented (from Petition)

Federal a gents found heroin during a warrantless search of a backpac k that they seized from Petitioner as he exited a bus . Agents then arrested Petitioner for possessing with intent to distribute the heroin found by their search . Respondent later justified the search as having ta ken place “incident to arrest .” It is undisputed that, months before the backpack search, the agency showe d probable cause to believe that Petitioner had conspir ed to distribute drugs. On the day of the backpac k’s search, there was no evidence introduced into the record that agents had effectively arrested Petitioner based on probable cause for any particular offense, or that they were about to do so , before they search ed and found the heroin. The question presented is: Whether the Fourth Amendment’s “search incident to arrest” exception permits a warrantless search anytime agents ha d probable cause to believe that a defendant had committed some arrestable offense -even when agents had made no arrest , and were not already going to make one, before the search. .

Docket Entries

2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-05-23
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 16, 2025)

Attorneys

Edward Magruder
Bruce Hamilton SearbySearby PLLC, Petitioner
Bruce Hamilton SearbySearby PLLC, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent