Whether the marital privilege warrants limiting the wife's testimony under extraordinary circumstances when failure to do so will allow highly prejudicial evidence of limited probative value?

I. WHETHER THE MARITAL PRIVILEGE WARRANTS LIMITING THE WIFE’S TESTIMONY UNDER EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN FAILURE TO DO SO WILL ALLOW HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL EVIDENCE OF LIMITED PROBATIVE VALUE? i INTERESTED PARTIES Counsel for the Petitioner, Dieudruch Emmanuel, certifies that the following persons and entities have or may have an interest in the outcome of this case: 1. Robert Adler, Assistant Federal Public Defender; on Richard Artur, Co-Defendant; 3. Danielle Croke, Assistant U.S. Attorney; 4. Dieudruch Emmanuel, Petitioner; 5. Jack A. Fleishman, Defense Counsel; 6. | Yeney Hernandez, Assistant U.S. Attorney; 7. Mitchell Hyman, Assistant U.S. Attorney; 8. Markenzy LaPointe, U.S. Attorney; 9. Honorable Shaniek M. Maynard, Magistrate Judge; 10. Daniel Matzkin, U.S. Attorney; 11. Richard L. Rosenbaum, Esq., Appellate Counsel; 12. Honorable Bruce E. Reinhart, U.S. Magistrate; 13. Honorable Robin L. Rosenberg, U.S. District Judge; 14. Lisa Tobin Rubio, Assistant U.S. Attorney; ii 15. Emily Stone, Assistant U.S. Attorney 16. Rinku T. Tribuiani, Assistant U.S. Attorney; 17. Patrick David Wilson, Esq.; 18. No publicly traded company or corporation has an interest in the outcome of this appeal. iii