Does the court violate a defendant's due process rights when imposing a sentence upon revocation of supervised release by using the PROTECT Act to sentence based on allegations of dangerous subsequent criminal conduct?

DOES THE COURT VIOLATE A DEFENDANT'S RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHEN IMPOSING A SENTENCE UPON REVOCATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE, WHEN THE COURT EMPLOYS THE PROTECT ACT AND SENTENCES DEFENDANT TO A MAXIMUM TERM OF IMPRISONMENT BASED ON THE DANGEROUS NATURE OF ALLEGATIONS OF SUBSEQUENT CRIMINAL CONDUCT WHICH FORM THE BASIS FOR THE VIOLATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE? i