No. 24-726

DISH Network L.L.C. v. Dragon Intellectual Property LLC, et al.

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2025-01-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (3)Response Waived
Tags: administrative-proceeding attorney-fees district-court-discretion fee-shifting joint-and-several-liability patent-law
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Patent Trademark Copyright Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Patent Act's fee-shifting statute allows a district court discretion to impose joint and several liability for attorney fees and to award fees from parallel administrative proceedings

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

The Patent Act’s fee-shif ting statute, 35 U.S.C. § 285, states: “The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.” The questions presented are: 1. Whether the Patent A ct’s fee-shifting statute allows a district court discretion to impose joint and several liability for the fee award on a party’s attorney whose actions substantially contribute to the exceptionality of the case. 2. Whether the same fee-shifting statute allows a district court discretion to award attorney’s fees incurred by a prevailing accused infringer in a parallel administrative proceeding to invalidate a patent.

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-10
Amicus brief of Unified Patents, LLC submitted.
2025-02-10
Amicus brief of The High Tech Inventors Alliance; the National Retail Federation submitted.
2025-02-10
Amicus brief of High Tech Inventors Alliance and the National Retail Federation submitted.
2025-02-10
Brief amici curiae of High Tech Inventors Alliance, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2025-02-10
2025-02-06
Amicus brief of Nextremity Solutions LLC submitted.
2025-02-06
Brief amicus curiae of Nextremity Solutions, LLC filed. (Distributed)
2025-02-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-02-04
Waiver of right of respondents Freitas & Weinberg LLP; Robert E. Freitas to respond filed.
2025-02-03
Waiver of Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC to respond filed.
2025-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 10, 2025)

Attorneys

DISH Network L.L.C.
Lauren Jarvis DreyerBaker Botts LLP, Petitioner
Lauren Jarvis DreyerBaker Botts LLP, Petitioner
Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC
James Francis McDonough IIIRozier Hardt McDonough PLLC, Respondent
James Francis McDonough IIIRozier Hardt McDonough PLLC, Respondent
Freitas & Weinberg LLP; Robert E. Freitas
Robert Edward FreitasFreitas & Weinberg LLP, Respondent
Robert Edward FreitasFreitas & Weinberg LLP, Respondent
High Tech Inventors Alliance and the National Retail Federation
Joseph Davod MatalClear IP, LLC, Amicus
Nextremity Solutions LLC
Teige Patrick SheehanHeslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti, PC, Amicus
Teige Patrick SheehanHeslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti, PC, Amicus
The High Tech Inventors Alliance; the National Retail Federation
Joseph Davod MatalClear IP, LLC, Amicus
Unified Patents, LLC
Jonathan Rudolph Kominek StroudUnified Patents, LLC, Amicus
Jonathan Rudolph Kominek StroudUnified Patents, LLC, Amicus
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Amicus
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Amicus