No. 24-7263

Yhanka Veras v. New York City Department of Education, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2025-05-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: ada civil-rights disabilities-act motion-practice rule-12b6 twiqbal
Key Terms:
DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the American With Disabilities Act (ADA) affords a litigant an accommodated plausibility standard under Twiqbal for Rule 12.b.6 motion practice when invisible/mental disability is operative

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Whether the American With Disabilities Act (ADA) affords a litigant, such as Yhanka Veras, an accommodated plausibility standard under Twiqbal, for Rule 12.b.6 motion practice, when invisible/mental disability is operative?

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent New York City Department of Education to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2025-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2025)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

New York City Department of Education
Martin K. Rowe III — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Martin K. Rowe III — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Yhanka Veras
Kissinger Nkosinathi Sibanda — The Law Office of Kissinger N. Sibanda Esq, Petitioner
Kissinger Nkosinathi Sibanda — The Law Office of Kissinger N. Sibanda Esq, Petitioner