Was the arbitrary denial of a sentencing continuance, which prevented U.S. Probation from considering Petitioner's mitigating evidence, and where U.S. Probation recommended a 50% upward variance from the top of the applicable guideline range, necessarily an abuse of discretion, violation of Rule 32, and the Due Process Clause?

Was the arbitrary denial of a sentencing continuance, which prevent ed U.S. Probation from considering Petitioner’s mitigating evidence, and where U.S. Probation recommended a 50% upward variance from the top of the applicable guideline range , necessarily an abuse of discretion , violation of Rule 32, and the Due Process Clause ?