No. 24-7277
Derek Michael Mims v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: evidence-suppression judicial-review motion-to-suppress probable-cause warrant-validity wiretap-application
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure Privacy
CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court judge who makes probable cause and necessity findings in connection with a wiretap application may later review its own findings in response to a motion to suppress the wiretap warrants
Question Presented (from Petition)
þ. Whether a district court judge who makes probable cause and necessity findings in connection with a wiretap application may later review its own findings in response to a motion to suppress the wiretap warrants.
Docket Entries
2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 23, 2025)
Attorneys
Derek Michael Mims
David Edmund Mullin — MULLIN & LAVERTY, LC, Petitioner
David Edmund Mullin — MULLIN & LAVERTY, LC, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent