Whether Massachusetts can constitutionally 'double protect' some citizens by revoking Constitutional protections for others, and whether LGBTQ+ immunities permit using federal reimbursements to separate children from parents

1) The Commonwealth of Massachusetts aims to “double protect ”1 some citizens at the expense of revoking all protections from others, including Constitutional rights. Does “double protecting ” some waive Constitutional protections for all? 2) Do any immunities apply to an “LGBTQ+ ” Massachusetts when using federal “reimbursements ” to subsidize forceful separation and agenda-driven extreme alienation 2 of innocent American children from their loving American parents? 1 See “State Constitutional Law Declares Its Independence: Double Protecting Rights During a Time of Federal Constitutional Upheaval ” by Scott L. Kafker, Associate Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, as published at . 2 See . n TJST OF PARTIES All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. The list of all