No. 24-7289
Fidel Saldana Rodriguez v. United States
Tags: appellate-review burden-of-proof criminal-conviction evidence-sufficiency inference-standard reasonable-doubt
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether evidence that requires a series of inferences to reach an element of an offense, rather than showing the element directly or after a single inference, is sufficient to support a conviction under the beyond a-reasonable-doubt standard
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether evidence that requires a series of inferences to reach an element of an offense, rather than showing the element directly or after a single inference, is sufficient to support a conviction under the beyond a-reasonable -doubt standard.
Docket Entries
2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 26, 2025)
Attorneys
Fidel Saldana Rodriguez
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent