No. 24-7292
Germaine Ramsey v. United States
Tags: appellate-review certiorari grant-vacate-remand judicial-discretion supreme-court-procedure thompson-case
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should grant, vacate, and remand (GVR) in light of Thompson v. United States
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether the Court should GVR in light of Thompson v. United States , 604 U.S. ___, 145 S. Ct. 821 (2025) .
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-07
Reply of Germaine Ramsey submitted.
2025-08-07
Reply of petitioner Germaine Ramsey filed.
2025-07-25
memorandum for the united states in opposition of United States submitted.
2025-07-25
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-06-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 28, 2025.
2025-06-18
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-06-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 26, 2025 to July 28, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 26, 2025)
Attorneys
Germaine Ramsey
Matthew B. Larsen — Federal Defenders of New York, Petitioner
Matthew B. Larsen — Federal Defenders of New York, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent