Whether a victim who is a plaintiff has the right to appeal a defendant's sentencing if they believe the trial court made a legal mistake or abused its discretion

1. Common grounds for appeal include legal errors, procedural errors, new evidence, inadequate representation, and unreasonable prejudice. When the plaintiff has proven both a legal mistake and that the mistake impacted the decision. Compensation from a crime and being sentencing for committing a crime differs. Can a victim appeal a defendant's sentencing if they believe the trial court made a mistake of law or abused its discretion, or if there's an error in the facts? A victim who is a plaintiff who has the right to appear pro se in federal court is defined by statute 28 U.S.C. § do that plaintiff has the right to appeal a defendant sentencing in court? 2. Discrimination is a major part of society. The colored population are amongst the highest incarcerated These police officer sutton and zabavsky are Caucasian Mr. Karon Hylton is black. The years giving to colored offenders that have committed the same crime as Caucasian is unbalanced. Robert Hylton who is Karon Hylton's brother was falsely charged and given a lengthy sentencing but hasn't commit murder. Is there a law that states colored humans and Caucasian humans should be charged and sentenced separately. If there isn't a law, please explain why Mr. Robert Hylton was given a lengthy sentencing yet sutton and zabavsky commit murder yet they are given lenient sentencing 3. it states under the Department of Justice's rules governing petitions for executive clemency, is there is a minimum waiting period of five years after completion of sentence before anyone convicted of a federal offense becomes eligible to apply for a presidential pardon. Lying under oath by a government official including the president of the United States grounds for impeachment. President Trump mentions of these officers stating they were chasing an illegal Karon Hylton isn't an illegal. President Trump also said these police officer has severed 5 years. These police officer sutton and zabavsky hadn't served 5 years. Are the statement made by President Trump acknowledgements of a offenders having to serve before a pardon can be granted and yet still granted such pardon? 28CFR ssl . 1 et seq specially states MANDATORY serving of 5 years before applying or consider of a presidential pardon. Was mandatory stated to navigate confusion? Does police officers especially Caucasian police officers have the right to abuse authority to include murder, receive 5 years sentencing after a guilty conviction and be pardon without serving MANDATORY sentence of 5 Years? What messages is that sending to Humans of the United States and how does violates the Constitution?