No. 24-7301
Dennis J. Rydbom v. Jonathan Frame, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: assistance-of-counsel constitutional-rights defense-strategy hybrid-representation self-representation sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-06-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did Judge Reed mislead Rydbom on the Assistance of Counsel clause by improperly interfering with his right to strategic defense control?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Rydbom sought self-representation to gain strategic control of his criminal defense. Judge Reed insisted that represented defendants already control their defenses (e.g., what motions to file, what witnesses to call, & how the defense is prepared). After much debate, Rydbom yielded to the trial judge's defense scenario. Did Judge Reed mislead Rydbom on the Assistance of Counsel clause? -11
Docket Entries
2025-06-23
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2025.
2025-05-30
Waiver of right of respondent Jonathan Frame, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex to respond filed.
2025-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 27, 2025)
Attorneys
Jonathan Frame, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex