Whether the Eleventh Circuit's plain error review properly considered the full record under United States v. Davila when rejecting Mr. Windham's claim about judicial participation in plea negotiations, and whether repeated misstatements about safety-valve eligibility rendered Mr. Windham's plea invalid

I. Whether the Eleventh Circuit ’s plain error review properly considered the full record under United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013) , or wrongly limited itself to the second plea hearing, when it rejected Mr. Windham’s claim that but for improper judicial participation in plea negotiations, Mr. Windham would have exercised his constitutional right to a trial ? II. Whether repeated misstatements about safety -valve eligibility rendered Mr. Windham’s plea invalid under United States v. Dominguez Benitez , 542 U.S. 74 (2004) ?