No. 24-7310

Ian Leonard Clark v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-05-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-challenge federal-constitution judicial-interpretation state-law statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Supreme Court agree with the Appellant's claim that Oregon Revised Statute 14.270 is unconstitutional?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

The Appellant respectfully requests the Court to determine the applicability of Oregon Revised Statute 14.270. Appellant finds ORS 14.270 to be in violation of the Federal Constitution. However, the District Court does not accept the illegality of 14.270 as true. The Appellate Court does not agree with the Plaintiff that the District Courts refusal to repeal 14.270 is, of itself, unconstitutional. Does the Supreme Court agree with the Appellant or with the decision of the lower courts that ORS 14.270 should remain and continue in its current form?

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-09
Waiver of right of respondent Tina Kotek to respond filed.
2025-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 27, 2025)

Attorneys

Ian L. Clark
Ian Leonard Clark — Petitioner
Ian Leonard Clark — Petitioner
Tina Kotek
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent