No. 24-7315

Kenyon Lamonte Watson v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-05-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bail-reform-act criminal-procedure fifth-amendment grand-jury pretrial-detention res-judicata
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2025-06-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government can seek pretrial detention in a second related prosecution after a magistrate judge has previously denied detention and ordered release in an earlier related case, and whether the presumption of pretrial detention under the Bail Reform Act may be triggered solely by an indictment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Both the Constitution and the Bail Reform Act presume pretrial release. This petition presents the question of whether, under the Fifth Amendment and the allied doctrine of res judicata, the government can seek, or a magistrate judge order, pretrial detention in a second related prosecution after a magistrate judge has previously denied detention and ordered release in an earlier related case involving the same defendant. This issue arises where both prosecutions are based on the same underlying factual allegations and have been designated as related by the government and treated as such by the reviewing courts? A related question is whether the presumption of pretrial detention under the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3), may be triggered solely by the return of an indictment, absent a separate finding of probable cause by a judicial officer?

Docket Entries

2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 30, 2025)

Attorneys

Kenyon Watson
Chad PenningtonFederal Public Defender, C. District of California, Petitioner
Chad PenningtonFederal Public Defender, C. District of California, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent