No. 24-7322

Samuel Lee Smith, Jr. v. A. Rodriguez

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2025-05-29
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: color-of-law fourth-amendment injunction procedural-due-process rights-deprivation trial-court-error
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the trial court commit reversible error in dismissing the petition for an injunction to prevent stalking? Did the court violate procedural due process when denying Petitioner relief without a hearing? Did the officer violate the Petitioner's 4th Amendment rights? Are the trial courts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Did the trial court commit reversible error ’s dismissing the petition for an injunction to prevent Respondent from stalking? Did the court violate the procedural due process clause, enshrined in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution when it denied Petitioner relief without affording him a hearing in violation of the Petitioner ’s due process right to notice, opportunity to be heard and the right to have a decision from an impartial decision-maker as guaranteed by the 5th and 14th amendments to the United States Constitution? Did the officer violate the Petitioners 4th Amendment rights? Are the trial courts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § Section 242 Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law? Divine law beliefs center on the idea that moral and ethical principles originate from a higher power or God, shaping both individual and societal behavior. These laws are often seen as superior to human-made laws and are believed to be universal, eternal, and unchanging. 2

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2025-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 30, 2025)

Attorneys

Samuel Lee Smith
Samuel Lee Smith Jr. — Petitioner
Samuel Lee Smith Jr. — Petitioner