No. 24-7327
Artur Gilowski v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: None
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION^] PRESENTED Weather defense Counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failure to request special jury instructions that would allow the jury to make a determination whether a conspiracy existed, or it was just a common buyer seller relationship for the criminal acts charged in the indictment. LIST OF PARTY All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.
Docket Entries
2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 30, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent