Whether a sincerely motivated religious expression establishes a prima facie case of religious discrimination under Title VII without additional showing of undue hardship

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 broadly observance and practice,” unless the employer shows that reasonably accommodating that practice would See 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a)  H M in employment decisions,” without showing undue hardship. E.E.O.C. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. , 575 U.S. 768, 773 (2015). In this case, the court of appeals and district court held that Daniel Snyder failed to establish a prima facie case ” App.21a. Both courts held that Mr . Sn yder failed to additionally court held he failed to provide a priori notice of his religious expression. The courts reached these conclusions by applying a preAbercrombie a-textual judicial test for adjudicating claims of failure to accommodate religious practice. a prima facie case under Abercrombie .