Where an officer of the court violates the 'Kokkonen rule' by 'enforcing' an on-the-record promise only, who has unambiguously invoked the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, under what circumstance is Petitioner charged on the matter of 'acceptance' thereunto and thereby purge the taint from a Kokkonen violation; inter alia?

Where an officer of the court violates the “Kokkonen rule ” by “enforcing ” an on-the-record promise only, who has unambiguously invoked the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, under what circumstance is Petitioner charged on the matter of “acceptance ” ;v *■ Page 3 of 43 thereunto and thereby purge the taint from a Kokkonen violation; inter alia ? In Allgever v. Louisiana , the Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana statute that restricted citizens ’ ability to contract for insurance outside the state, establishing the principle of economic liberty under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. The Question Presented: Where an officer of the court violates Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the U. S. Constitution against “Freedom of Contract, ” who has duly invoked equal protection, under what circumstance is the abridgement of such privileges justifiable under Fourteenth Amendment rights and thereby purge a taint from the Allgeyer decision; sua sponte? i ■s* Page 4 of 43 ■V II.