Sheterria Lanelle Jackson v. Florida
DueProcess
Did the trial court err when it denied petitioner's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge evidence and for failing to file a motion to suppress, violating her Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and her Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law?
! iI. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR WHEN IT DENIED PETITIONER ’S CLAIM THAT i ! ICOUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO CHALLENGE EVIDENCE > ■ ; PRESENTED AND FOR FAILING TO FILE A MOTION TO SUPPRESS, IN TURN ; ; 5 !VIOLATING HER SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF : ; ;COUNSEL AND HER FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF ! LAW?: i iII. WAS THE PETITIONER ’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE : !ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL UNDER THE SIXT AMENDMENT AND DUE PROCESS ; RIGHT UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT VIOLATED WHEN TEH TRIAL: COURT DENIED PETITIONER ’S CLAIM THAT COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE ; ; FOR FAILING TO ISSUE FOR A PRE-TRIAL MOTION TO DISMISS? ! ! i : : !:! ! ! I i ; i 1 i ! t : ; ! i i; i ! 11!: i : i; ! ir i r