No. 24-7344

Sheterria Lanelle Jackson v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2025-06-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process ineffective-assistance motion-to-suppress sixth-amendment trial-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the trial court err when it denied petitioner's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge evidence and for failing to file a motion to suppress, violating her Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and her Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

! iI. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR WHEN IT DENIED PETITIONER ’S CLAIM THAT i ! ICOUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO CHALLENGE EVIDENCE > ■ ; PRESENTED AND FOR FAILING TO FILE A MOTION TO SUPPRESS, IN TURN ; ; 5 !VIOLATING HER SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF : ; ;COUNSEL AND HER FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF ! LAW?: i iII. WAS THE PETITIONER ’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE : !ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL UNDER THE SIXT AMENDMENT AND DUE PROCESS ; RIGHT UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT VIOLATED WHEN TEH TRIAL: COURT DENIED PETITIONER ’S CLAIM THAT COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE ; ; FOR FAILING TO ISSUE FOR A PRE-TRIAL MOTION TO DISMISS? ! ! i : : !:! ! ! I i ; i 1 i ! t : ; ! i i; i ! 11!: i : i; ! ir i r

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2025-04-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Sheterria L. Jackson
Sheterria L. Jackson — Petitioner
State of Florida
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent