No. 24-7345
Anita Sue Bryant v. Estate of Laura J. Bryant
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure case-dismissal court-of-appeals in-forma-pauperis notice-requirement procedural-due-process
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Indiana Court of Appeals improperly closed Appellant's case without addressing pending motions and without providing notice
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Indiana Court of Appeals erred in improperly closing Appellant ’s case when Appellant specifically requested that the appeal be placed on hold (pending motion) until Appellant exhausted all remedies (continuance), in the Notice of Appeal that the court did not address, and when a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis was still pending in trial court before dismissing Appellant ’s case and without notice to Appellant, resulting in not giving Appellant an opportunity to correct?
Docket Entries
2026-01-28
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2025-12-04
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 3, 2025)