Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in accepting a plea agreement where the defendant was not adequately informed of material provisions, and whether the District Court unreasonably sentenced the defendant at the high end of the Sentencing Guidelines range and improperly applied a two-level enhancement for Obstruction

I. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred because the District Court improperly accepted a plea and proceeded with sentencing where Mr. Jones had not been apprised of material provisions in the Plea Agreement, and had not been adequately informed about the plea and sentencing process. II. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred because the District Court unreasonably sentenced Mr. Jones at the high end of the United States Sentencing Guidelines range. III. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred because the District Court improperly applied a two-level enhancement for Obstruction under United States Sentencing Guideline Sec. 3Cl.1. i RULE 14.1(b) STATEMENT There are no parties in addition to those listed in the caption. ail