No. 24-7363
Wesley-Keith Mullings v. Harriet Elaine Raghnal, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: circuit-split due-process institutional-manipulation parental-rights pro-se-litigants rooker-feldman
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2026-01-23
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a circuit split exists regarding Rooker-Feldman doctrine's application to void judgments and whether institutional manipulation violates due process for pro se litigants
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. Circuit Split: Should Rooker-Feldman bar federal review of void ab initio judgments due to jurisdictional fraud, or do Moreno/Nugent compel examination? 2. Due Process: Does institutional manipulation (18-day vs. 12month timelines) violate equal protection for pro se litigants? 3. Parental Rights: Can courts enforce custody orders procured by legally impossible standing without violating Troxel? PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI UNDER EMERGENCY -2 PARTIES AND
Docket Entries
2026-01-26
Rehearing DENIED.
2026-01-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/23/2026.
2025-10-22
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 7, 2025)
Attorneys
Wesley-Keith Mullings
Wesley-Keith Mullings — Petitioner