No. 24-7366

Damien Deshawn Pugh v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-06-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law disability-benefits due-process medical-evidence social-security supplemental-security-income
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether social security applicants are unfairly subjected to political opinions that deviate from medical facts in disability determinations

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

This petition involves three questions of exceptional importance: Why does social security applicants have to endure unnecessary subjection of politics and opinions that never derive from the medical facts presented for an applicants case?1. 42 US. Code § 1382 is part of the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program that was implemented to safeguard retired and tenured Us federal, state and county employees, is it enough?2. The United States is divided into the bipartisan parties of Republic and Democratic. Are we protected fro either party ’s reform policies?3.

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-10-15
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-01
Waiver of Bisignano, Comm'r, Social Sec. of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent Bisignano, Comm'r, Social Sec. to respond filed.
2025-06-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 7, 2025)

Attorneys

Bisignano, Comm'r, Social Sec.
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor KabaHueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent
Damien D. Pugh
Damien D. Deshawn Pugh — Petitioner
Damien D. Deshawn Pugh — Petitioner