I WAS IT INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL OF APPELLATE COUNSELS FAILURE TO ARGUE THAT TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILURE TO ARGUE THE ADMISSION OF DISCRIMINATORY EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANTS ALLEGED GANG MEMBERSHIP OR ASSOCIATION VIA TESTIMONY OF STATES WITNESS, JOE AMERUNGA WITHOUT ANY FOUNDATION OR PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE FALSE

Whether appellate counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to challenge the admission of discriminatory gang membership evidence through a state witness without foundation or personal knowledge