No. 24-738
Juan Cartaya v. Travelers Indemnity Company
Tags: appraisal-process arbitration contract-interpretation dispute-resolution federal-arbitration-act insurance-law
Key Terms:
Arbitration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the insurance industry's appraisal process constitutes arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the insurance industry’s appraisal process, which fully and finally resolves insurer-insured disputes over the loss amount when two of three appraisers agree to a figure, is an arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act.
Docket Entries
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-31
Reply of Juan Cartaya submitted.
2025-03-31
Reply of petitioner Juan Cartaya filed. (Distributed)
2025-03-14
Brief of Travelers Indemnity Company in opposition submitted.
2025-03-14
Brief of respondent Travelers Indemnity Company in opposition filed.
2025-02-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 14, 2025.
2025-02-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 12, 2025 to March 14, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2025)
2024-09-13
Application (24A232) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until October 15, 2024.
2024-08-29
Application (24A232) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 15, 2024 to November 14, 2024, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Juan Cartaya
Ty Gee — Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, Petitioner
Ty Gee — Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, Petitioner
Travelers Indemnity Company
Evan B. Stephenson — Spencer Fane, LLP, Respondent
Evan B. Stephenson — Spencer Fane, LLP, Respondent