No. 24-7381

Charlene Rosa v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2025-06-09
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: None
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

fj, VijVjAVw ~^ tclrA <^XX ‘So-tfHA/M. Cov-*^ OjiLk^cM) VKoVoW -A.V1J2. Suj,f&M$icW\ d<Ui9dl ojW iVi^ fltrvciL&z cIomsjz a-tJ Cajp ou'eJuA -ivuHoiii V\&$ •& \^ajV\A'-V\<^ VX)WaA V\c4&£S lS CeSMQ us icwojuf' ‘AqAjl ^ujA ujW cVi sW ts oArqA'A W jia \oou4fiA ^ircwi ^iJvn<j voros^, \M V>oMa -\VicA UcU)4v euwci CmW iMjiJuccU OvsjA vmAAooA ^^ov\oj, ovAstv 1 <Alsjtes;Uuje. ©^Asty ©v\ ^um<Aav\<^ UjkA ^WW m^ CeM>u.ij SuA)S^'*s>/A\V) ~t\auL ■f{cnAdLfi» Svj^f^MX CmjtA ^ •' ■ • i cnAuuir' Wmna hjur' ^mv\ -f% CSl\WA nAWSJL vM iV\A CwvwA , m4 jdzci-ei SjuKcMi© C£AM/J (DAcloeaM.^^P 1^^ -\;kjAiA ^ •&. ’(UaAujV) <=V> sJd UJiMJaA f\ wVAV uat 'A i& VX^CcAA f' ^(^4* »t ^ ^4'^ctAX ^ i 'uji. -fi^oriA °yfjr$ iMu/JiX 3a C&l/liuiAMJui ihjL ~$]lPjVV\&L /'qima &l{?s V(dbXicY) cfj V\vr \0rHicA 6Y)^ Vobii-^Q^l^ yMSi'^f ■fWd ^1/iai JUxytoi siMQh&QJi \M 'fto^ oWumS euwa oJa^cuA^Uf K A n A -Prv a i\a (a rtA&u ; /,/.. ^ ^ ■^TTrntd r \—r VXlteU-QAr ^ i^V^cai hj3jl cQ & (W-g>lS4> QrijeywiM jk-g. So-aHcA^V\ Cf\ d\aJI VjJua3P^^w^ , &W «/to ^ ^cm^O xAg/V) cJv 'mMaj^ T km A At 3luj^ v/ropU^ c\<xkxq ji> aUA _ _ _ -jo VHoVatjb VCqS> cAulwA SuWv^Vu \a^caM^ Vjjt Vug duArs 7 ~iw\y\o omV vM VAjJ g^-fh^ ^K)^acultm^ £UvdbMC&/( VX) KtStWv (X >(\YAgcv\AJ^ SkkM^T ~^m^iajraWU. daA AAaM. >Tkw\ &3\afab qj^X v-A-^A) louurks SjXLiSiW ] ^QaAv^sja^ ^yfl&£, t-\crUAo C\c»oJvM ^ violaM^v]" °i b&Ar yircVgoWJ Sjo^cmcnA/i^ H^\Aj\ovx tijjrWjS&tyA 0! YiSf cIoulUi a$ a, Cw^uM Wi 1Vke , ^o<u4 ^ jViai loQJVXWl (XM& & SviJlQSA^VKsSLVW ba^fCAM, ^TTu/lfl i>A 1Vvl Co\JuA V)0>v3o£\O A vM^U aJPVA v lM V0 W Ccli\A\JAi]jA^A *tWA Is &MV&TW "CoTaxu A\ "Q^AA vcssPx >(^r ^DootS;VtoA-gQ-^o ojW accuSL^d f

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2025-07-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-03-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2025)

Attorneys

Charlene Rosa
Charlene Rosa — Petitioner