Whether the defendant's constitutional rights were violated by ineffective assistance of counsel, improper search warrants, withheld discovery, and potentially false FBI evidence during criminal proceedings

ONE Were the constitutional rights of Robert Timothy Blake violated when his Trial Attorney failed to notice/ dispute/or Challenge the validity of the Search Warrant in this case ? TWO Were the defendant's constitutional rights violated/ when his password protected e-mail account was accessed by the FBI without a valid Search Warrant with Probable Cause ? THREE Was the defendant prejudiced and denied due process/ when the Government's Attorney withheld ; & denied the defendant discovery of specific requested document's and evidence/ that was clearly requested by the defence attorney prior to the Suppression of Evidence hearing/ and the defendant's change of Plea ? FOURr Were this defendant's constitutional rights violated, when the FBI agent's own notes of an interrogation that was not recorded/will be modified and adjusted with false information and evidence/ that will compose the factual basis written into the Plea agreement/ and establish the only knowingly aspects of this case to show a concerning "Scienter ?" Where the "knowingly conditions are a fabrication that is not supported by the evidence or testimony in the record. I. i FIVE Did the FBI provide knowingly false statements and knowingly unreliable evidence/ in reckless disregard to the validity of the information to# obtain a search warrant for this defendant's home ? SIX Did the defendant's attorney provide constitutionally competent assistance of counsel by not seeking or understanding the e-mail evidence in this case/ prior to advising the defendant to Plea Guilty/ Or before attempting to defend the defendant of the e-mail evidence and distribution charges at sentencing ? SEVEN Did the government's attorney interfere with the fair administration of justice at a constitutional level/ by presenting/ and purpousfully allowing the Sentencing Court to depend upon false and altered information and evidence that the Attorney will know to be false and unreliable/ and not known to the defendant at any previous time ? EIGHT Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals properly deny this defendant's for habeas relief/ in an effort to raise claims for relief/ that were not known/ at any previous time before he, will file his initial habeas petition in ..the District Court ? Was this petitioner denied a full and fair oppertunity to/ present previous claims denied as "Premature" ? II. i-V i