Did the State court err in denying trial counsel's effectiveness in multiple instances, including challenging peremptory challenges, filing sentence modifications, addressing potential conflicts of interest, and alleging prosecutorial misconduct?

1. Did the State court erred in denying trial counsel was ineffective in failing to suggest how crossexamination might have been beneficial concerning racially discriminatory peremptory challenges; 2) ask that the trial court pose any questions to the prosecutor; or 3) suggest any areas of concern with explanation given by the prosecutor? 2. Did the State court erred in denying trial counsel was ineffective in failing to inform the court that the State failed to prove petitioner “Doesn ’t meet the Statutory Requirements ” for an “Enhanced Punishment? ” 3. Did the State court erred in denying trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file “Modification of Sentence, ” within 90 days after sentencing, as requested by Petitioner? 4. Did the State court erred in denying trial counsel was ineffective by representing both the Petitioner and Jail-House Informant, conflict of interest? 5. Did the State court erred in denying that the State withheld exculpatory evidence —DNA; Brady violation? 6. Did the State court erred in denying prosecutorial misconduct by allowing the State to nolle prosequi the weapon, after the trial begun, and Double-Jeopardy attached regarding the weapon? 7. Did the State Court erred in denying prosecutorial misconduct by engaging in extra-judicial conspiracy with Government witness, Michael Malone, F.B.I. (Hair Analysis Unit)? 8. Did the State court erred in denying Petitioner ’s “illegal sentence, ” regarding Maryland Rule 4-345 and refused to comply with both of the Appellate Court ’s mandate from the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland and the Supreme Court of Maryland rulings?