No. 24-7396
Arturo Garza, Jr. v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure mandate-rule resentencing sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the mandate rule precludes or permits a district court from recalculating a defendant's Sentencing Guidelines range at resentencing based on intervening convictions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
There is a conflict among the United States Courts of Appeals regarding the scope of the mandate for resentencing on remand. The question is: Wh ether the mandate rule precludes a district court from recalculating a defendant’s Sentencing Guidelines range at resentencing based on convictions received between the first and second sentencings (as the First Circuit holds), or whether the mandate rule permits such recalculation of the Guidelines range (as the Fifth, Eighth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits hold).
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-10
Reply of petitioner Arturo Garza, Jr. filed. (Distributed)
2025-12-10
Reply of Arturo Garza, Jr. submitted.
2025-11-24
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-11-24
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-11-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 24, 2025.
2025-11-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2025 to November 24, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-11-06
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-10-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 13, 2025.
2025-10-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 14, 2025 to November 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-10-07
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-09-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 14, 2025.
2025-09-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 11, 2025 to October 14, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-09-08
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-08-12
Response Requested. (Due September 11, 2025)
2025-07-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-07-01
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 11, 2025)
Attorneys
Arturo Garza, Jr.
Rosa Victoria Garcia-Cross — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent