No. 24-74

In Re Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas Bey

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-07-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: 14th-amendment 8th-amendment black-negro-colored-persons constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment jurisdiction property state-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-12-06 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (from Petition)

Questions Presented for Review Since birth, Alphonza L. P. Thomas-Bey has been held hostage in an unfair, unjust, social, economic, and legal system. And all questions raised and lower courts and the prison administrative agency should have been, yet were never addressed. . 1. Is it an 8th Amendment violation of the United States Constitution, under cruel and unusual punishment, for the State of North Carolina to impose life imprisonment on a Moorish American National that the State of North Carolina does not have the jurisdiction or status over'. ° ne 2. As for Black, Negro, and Colored persons with — criminal] records, what crimes can property possibly commit that its owner, the slave master (State and Federal Courts), is not accountable for in a court of law when the 14th Amendment establishes the formerly enslaved person as property under the jurisdiction of the state court of residence andthe = federal court system as certified at live birth re ae ‘ ’ , 3. How can the word Black, Negro, colored persons . find no former place within the nationalities of the human family and still can be made citizens of any ; . free national constitutional government} ~+ ? f gor cs Sat nn eh omen ene ne baad oo ; 4. Where a claim is to be satisfied out of a fund that is accessible only by the aid of a court of equity, can an application be made to the said court in the first instance, and if said claim satisfies the debt of a ; prison sentence, is the related imprisonment rational under a rational basis review? sf the ariew 7 “, * 5. Under the 4th Amendment,:can a state corporate entity be an accuser against a natural person and claim to be the victim or witness?sj “Ft Sun tam GP a. Fk eke th Ds . , : tt a et Par a . . 6. Historically, have Black persons been given fair 7 ; trials and arrests}; o ikifise sasewer sounds iu —_ : eemhemebee ror . ee oo BTA CH OR My Cre SL ON ye ae Pte Se Nag ROT aes thE Doe chen tt 7. 1s a libelous misnomer the type of particular description called for in the 4th Amendment and a proper due process} av? 7. SUV Re te: . : LENA LO Abs con a Coa Ca Ea dae ke bee | Ringe ai ho ebasee? . ; / ; 8. Is it reasonable to seize a person at gunpoint who , is not a suspect and not under a warrant for arrest when the purpose of the seizure is simply to speak : with that person who refused to be taken before seeing guns?; and if che avsi/ur <Jaias UF contract or os { 4 9. When no information is given to a Magistrate Judge, is it lawful to issue a warrant for arrest per the 4th Amendment?! 6: th 6 saver satu whee Ge te / a Ao, ; Vooagl SORT mene . ve Ne , wpdae 6 war haul 10. Is a grand jury indictment valid per the 5th : Amendment if no oath or affirmation was taken to : support probable cause for a warrant to issue to arrest the person who is indicted?; #0} :fipeni. 5p Me ay ERE a ee a BROS 08 Tae ee , 11. If no probable cause is proven at arrest, is it a 5th Amendment violation to subject the arrested to ; jeopardy again before a grand jury where the ee soe . j ee . arrested is indicted?) wv 1¥ 0) oaewer ce nee . CRORABPE OT OE OTK te SYRLANUG pats stems fi Fy oh ee ee _ We ner aa — aan Wie 980 eri et Oo canetution'n pab \ eo EO tw ie Se 4 AY uppin WE RON Pee ui hu Ab SOS, x I eT ee % aoViag that Pema up aston eo. 5 . " ~ ~~ Tee : iv } prstan th ole 8 un Pt Senay Bee arn ‘ OPE co be tee ate pete See ~ . vty Sg Ns ” phy eo Te “ . ™ wt. we ee ~ . . ko L 123 If the State of North Carolina possesses themselves wrongfully and fraudulently of the Tribe of Ali’s Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas-Bey who has always been and is the servant of his Father ; Allah, does North Carolina hold such servant any damages, loss, or cost in Trust for the rightful Master ... cote . Allah under U.C.C. § 2-711 et. seq aed Pthe ges oe AGF Me POD orb heh I om | | | RVG g

Docket Entries

2024-12-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-01
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-05

Attorneys

In Re Alphonza Thomas Bey
Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas Bey III — Petitioner
Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas Bey III — Petitioner