No. 24-7404

Zoe Ajjahnon v. Edward Sandler

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2025-06-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-theft constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection per-curium-affirmed property-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Securities Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-12-05 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Florida 6th DCA's Per Curium: Affirmed (PCA) law violates the US Constitution's 14th Amendment due process and equal protection provisions

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether the Fla. 6thDCA application of the State ’s Per Curium: Affirmed (PCA) law violates the US Constitution 14th Amendment and perpetuates affirmance of deprivation of property and liberties in denial of the Amendment ’ due process of law guarantees and equal protection of law provisions. THE PARTIES Zoe Ajjahnon of 110 Chestnut Ridge Road, Montvale, NJ 07645 is a Writer for the NJ based LOI Network, Inc. LOI is an Information Analysis company that treats current issues of international physical and economic securities risks. In this capacity Plaintiff has submitted intelligence of domestic and international securities compromises to U.S. Government authorities charged with enforcing laws to restore these securities. LOI ’s intelligence to proper US government official implicate one Michael Reuben Bloomberg, former NYC mayor and actors formerly of the FBI and other areas of the U.S. DOJ. These actors are involved in the Fla. PCA law in question on petition for certiorari to the Sixth (6th) DCA and the cases directly related to it. , Edward Sandler of 610 Swallow Dr., Casselberry, FL 32707; Ph.: 407-869-7370 Email: eas32712@yahoo.com states himself to be a Real Estate Broker and owner of 90 rental units of Suncrest Realty; Ph: 407-869-7370; i Edward Sandler is Landlord actor/agent for Sandler Holdings Inc. the entity holder of 7457#D Daniel Webster, Winter Park, FL 32792 that Plaintiff rented from Sandler, April 3rd, 2020 for one year plus two subsequent similar 12-month lease contracts entered into April 1st, 2021 and April 1st, 2022. Plaintiff resided at this rental when Edward Sandler, Defendant Respondent burglarized the premises burglarized the premises on 10/12/2021 to steal and did steal Petitioner ’s MAC ID. In all these proceedings, Defendant has offered no contest to having stolen Plaintiff Petitioner ’s MAC ID. In fact, he cannot, the record is of him sending a text from Petitioner ’s dwelling address to Petitioner at the time of his theft of the MAC ID. RELATED CASES Instant Petition before the Court arises from, and is directly related to the issues of the civil theft trial case of the Fla. 6th DCA PCA on petition for certiorari. The Sixth DCA appeal court adjudication of the civil theft by application of Fla. PCA law is further entwined with the civil theft ’s “criminal intent ” and “conversion ” elements for and by which the civil theft was executed. To clarify, Edward Sandler ’s theft of Petitioner ’s MAC ID was given to one Michael Reuben Bloomberg to continue a retaliation scheme that has as its aim, the end of any and all Petitioner ’s ii financial resources. Michael Reuben Bloomberg ’s retaliation scheme informs both the ‘criminal intent ’ and ‘conversion ’ elements of Edward Sandler ’ civil theft. The stolen MAC ID property was converted in the various cybercrimes of the retaliation scheme that prevented Petitioner the liberty of gainful employment concurrent necessarily with depleting existing resources that would naturally eventually result in the loss of her rented dwelling. The trial court civil theft case. Case No.: 2023-CC-007283-Q is therefore linked to Sandler ’ action to displace Petitioner from her dwelling once the cybercrimes of the retaliation scheme effected the complete depletion of all Petitioner ’ finances. The matter is argued as fraud on the court in this case. Petitioner ’ appeal from Sandler ’ writ of possession was before Fla Fifth (5th) DCA Case No.: 5D22-2629, This Fifth (5th) DCA appeal was decided in a PCA, which ruling came before the U.S. Supreme Court on Petition for Certiorari to the 5th DCA, Case No.: 22-6492, filed Jan. 4th 2023. Petition was denied for ‘moot ’ as well as “at the Court ’s discretion ” whereas the case was no longer before the 5th DCA on the date of filing. It was transferred to the Sixth (6th) DCA as of Jan. P* 2023, Case No.: 6D2023-1564. (App. J, 508a-509a) On 12/17/2024 the 6th DCA rendered PCA disposition on this case. (App. D, 4a) iii In Florid

Docket Entries

2025-12-08
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-10-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-01
Waiver of Edward Sandler of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent Edward Sandler to respond filed.
2025-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 11, 2025)

Attorneys

Edward Sandler
Jessica Christy ConnerDean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Respondent
Jessica Christy ConnerDean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Respondent
Zoe Ajjahnon
Zoe Ajjahnon — Petitioner
Zoe Ajjahnon — Petitioner