No. 24-7431

Keisha Reynolds v. HNS Management Co., Inc., dba CTTransit, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2025-06-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: court-appointed-attorney law-of-the-case second-circuit stare-decisis summary-judgment vested-right
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Hodge v. Police Officers creates a vested right for court-appointed attorney under stare decisis or Law of the case doctrine

Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether Hodge v. Police Officers , 802 F.2d 58, 60 (2d Cir. 1986) creates a vested right when petitioner has previously benefited from a court appointed attorney, and is now dependent on such representation, under stare decisis or Law of the case doctrine. 2. Whether McDonnell , summary judgment adjudication, instructs the court to appoint an attorney, as a must, when a court appointed attorney becomes vested. ii This matter comes to this court from a direct appeal From the Second Circuit.

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-16
Waiver of right of respondent HNS Management Co., Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2025-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 16, 2025)

Attorneys

HNS Management Co., Inc., et al.
Adam J. LykeJackson Lewis P.C., Respondent
Adam J. LykeJackson Lewis P.C., Respondent
Keisha Reynolds
Kissinger Nkosinathi SibandaThe Law Office of Kissinger N. Sibanda Esq, Petitioner
Kissinger Nkosinathi SibandaThe Law Office of Kissinger N. Sibanda Esq, Petitioner