No. 24-7431
Keisha Reynolds v. HNS Management Co., Inc., dba CTTransit, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: court-appointed-attorney law-of-the-case second-circuit stare-decisis summary-judgment vested-right
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Hodge v. Police Officers creates a vested right for court-appointed attorney under stare decisis or Law of the case doctrine
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Hodge v. Police Officers , 802 F.2d 58, 60 (2d Cir. 1986) creates a vested right when petitioner has previously benefited from a court appointed attorney, and is now dependent on such representation, under stare decisis or Law of the case doctrine. 2. Whether McDonnell , summary judgment adjudication, instructs the court to appoint an attorney, as a must, when a court appointed attorney becomes vested. ii This matter comes to this court from a direct appeal From the Second Circuit.
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-16
Waiver of right of respondent HNS Management Co., Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2025-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 16, 2025)
Attorneys
HNS Management Co., Inc., et al.
Adam J. Lyke — Jackson Lewis P.C., Respondent
Adam J. Lyke — Jackson Lewis P.C., Respondent
Keisha Reynolds