No. 24-7433
Zquareus Troyez Immanuel Thomas v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: commerce-clause constitutional-power due-process federal-law interstate-commerce statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'affecting commerce' element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(l) requires more than proving the firearm or ammunition traveled across state lines at some unknown point in the past to be a constitutional exercise of Congress's power under the Interstate Commerce Clause
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the "affecting commerce" element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(l) requires more than proving the firearm or ammunition traveled across state lines at some unknown point in the past to be a constitutional exercise of Congress's power under the Interstate Commerce Clause.
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-11
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 16, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent
Zquareus Troyez Immanuel Thomas
Laura Kathleen Deskin — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Laura Kathleen Deskin — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner