Whether a court may uphold the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(l) based solely on Heller's presumptively lawful language without conducting historical analysis as required by Bruen and Rahimi

Whether a court may uphold the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(l) based solely on this Court's statement in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 626-27 & n.26 (2008), that "longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons" are "presumptively lawful," without conducting the historical analysis set forth in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), and United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. 680 (2024).