No. 24-7481

M. L. K., III v. Florida Department of Children and Families

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2025-06-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: None
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07 (distributed 3 times)

Question presented not available.

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-10
Motion for leave to file a brief in opposition under seal GRANTED.
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-09-19
Brief of respondent Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office in opposition filed.
2025-09-19
Motion for leave to file a brief in opposition under seal filed by respondent Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office.
2025-09-18
Brief of respondent Department of Children and Families in opposition filed.
2025-09-18
Brief of Department of Children and Families in opposition submitted.
2025-08-20
Response Requested. (Due September 19, 2025)
2025-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office to respond filed.
2025-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Children and Families to respond filed.
2025-07-23
Waiver of Department of Children and Families of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-23
Waiver of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-23
Motion (24M91) Granted.
2025-06-23
Motion Granted.
2025-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2025.
2025-03-03
Motion of petitioner for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal filed.
2025-03-03
Motion (24M91) of petitioner for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal filed.
2025-03-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 23, 2025)

Attorneys

Department of Children and Families
Sarah J. RumphFlorida Department of Children & Families, Respondent
M. L. K.
Thomas John Butler — Petitioner
Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office
Daniel E. NordbyShutts & Bowen LLP, Respondent
Dennis Wayne MooreStatewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Respondent