Whether government officials can be held liable for damages resulting from the bombing of Osage Avenue and violation of civil rights

1. Should the respondents in the above civil action be allowed to Escape justice when part of the respond ents namely the City of Philadelphia, PA have been convicted of the bombing the residents of Osage Ave. along with burning down said property, business along with personal property as well as murdering five babies? 2. Should the petitioner be put out of federal court and told to litigate these issues in state court? 3. Should the respondents be allowed to steal monies or abuse and / or misuse monies that the federal government gave to the City of Philadelphia, PA to compensate plaintiff and the other residents of Osage Ave.? 4. Should this amended complaint under Federals of Civil Procedures Rule 15 (b) be allowed to be heard on the merits of truth, and deprives us of our civil liberty and rights, where the respondents violated the 5th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America and these government officials must pay the plaintiff for the damage of property under this law; and where these government employees all took the swear by oath or / pledged to the Constitution duties of this country must be held to the strict standard of law under section (3) of the 14th Amendment. Was the Petitioner and community were never given a fair treatment of the law by these higher appellate courts, or time bar us out in the cold with our rights to these serious facts and is a serious error by the court, and a Conflict of Law. ”? 5. Should this court allow petitioner who is sui juris to be stripped from her rights because of the 3, 11 compromise that in this constitution illegally that ’s denial or 14th and 5th Amendment of the United States Constitutional Law, of the Due Process Clause, which prohibits arbitrary deprivation of “life, liberty, or property* by the government except as authorized by law; and when the U.S. the Supreme Court has interpreted these clauses broadly prior to 2022, concluding that they provide three protection: procedural due process (in civil and criminal proceed ings:) substantive due process, a prohibition against vague laws; and as the vehicle for the incorporation of the Bill of Rights? 6. Should the petitioner who is sui juris and family, friends, and the community of Osage Ave. suffer by the hands of evil of government officials for 40 years and the torturing by said defendants in the above caption of allowing to escape Equitable Relief, Physiological Damage, Mental Scars, Livelihood, and Sentimental Value etc. and the continuum of egregious malice by the court and the above caption violates the “Equal Protection ” clause under the 14th Amendment? 7. Should the question of redressing the nature of the bombing and materials used by United States Government agencies respondents Attorney General Office, FBI, State Officials, and E&I Dupont should be held accountable under the civil rights violation of the rule of law? 8. Should the U.S. Gov. Agencies be allowed to escape murder, whereas pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. section 1391(e) government officials that reside in the jurisdiction of Washington DC? Should the United States have to perform their duty pursuant to title 28 U.S.C. 1361 pertaining to the writ of mandamus? Ill 9. Should the respondents be allowed to get away from the damage, pursuant to Federal Explosive act 844(h) would have given the judge the full power of the law because of the nature of products being convicted? 10. Should the courts in the case let these Federal and State officials be allowed to get out of damage of product liability and violate the Color of Law of due process? 11. Should the Courts / defendants in this above matter be allowed to over violate their federal powers because E&I Dupont inc. are one of the five families that purchased this country and the defendant in this said matter and for these reasons we can ’t get a fair day in court? 12. Should all branches of this Government of this Republic, that ’s not a Democracy, be allowed to escape justi