No. 24-7494

Jesse Lavadis Crawford v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2025-06-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: asset-seizure circuit-court drug-transaction due-process post-deprivation-hearing proportionality
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Circuit Court must apply a specific test for determining when a post-deprivation hearing is required under the Due Process Clause, and whether the amount of seized assets is disproportionate to alleged drug transaction proceeds

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1 ARGUMENT J Whether there was a ‘Talpable-Error ” by which, the court and the parties have been misled, and a different disposition will result by a correction of the error? (See MCR 7.311(G) .referencing MCR 2.119(F)(3) ; 2 What test must a Circuit Court apply when determining whether and when a Post-Deprivation hearing is required Under the Due Process Clause? 3 The Amount of assets seized is “Disproportionate than the amount of money received puring the cours£of the, alleged ’drug transactions!

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 25, 2025)

Attorneys

Jesse L. Crawford
Jesse Lavadis Crawford — Petitioner