Whether the petitioner's post-traumatic stress disorder and alleged judicial failure to consider case merits justify dismissal with prejudice, and whether police officers should be held accountable for potential perjury

I. DID MY POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER MENTAL CONDITION PLAY A ROLL IN GETTING MY CASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, ALONG WITH THE JUDICIARY FAILING TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT A TRIAL MUST TAKE PLACE AND FOCUS ON MERITS OF THE CASE TO DETERMINE IF THE CASE IS FRIVOLOUS? II. BASED ON THE FACT THAT CORPORATION COUNSEL FAILED IN THE LOWER COURT TO FOLLOW AN ODER A D FIVE ME THE RELIEF THAT I WANTED AFTER ALL OF THESE YEARS THAT KEEPS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS TOLLING? III. LASTLY, SHOULD THE CHICAGO POLICE OFFICERS NAMED IN THE CAPTION BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR LIEING UNDER OATH, BE CONVICTED ON PERJURY, AND BE PROSECUTED UNDER LAW?