No. 24-766

Marcus O. Millsap v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-01-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: detainer eighth-circuit-interpretation habeas-corpus-ad-prosequendum interstate-agreement-on-detainers prisoner-custody prosecutorial-procedure
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

May a prosecutor and/or Court evade the provisions of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA) by obtaining custody of a prisoner through a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum first, and then maintaining custody of the prisoner via a detainer?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

May a prosecutor and/or Court evade the provisions of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (“IADA”) by obtaining custody of a prisoner through a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum first, and then maintaining custody of the prisoner via a detainer?

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-23
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 18, 2025)

Attorneys

Marcus O. Millsap
Michael Kiel KaiserLassiter & Cassinelli, Petitioner
Michael Kiel KaiserLassiter & Cassinelli, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent