1. Whether conflicting interlocutory orders from two district court judges, one admitting and the other deleting the pro se litigant's narrative statements content & evidence, raise significant pro se constitutional rights violation and judicial procedure consistency concerns for fairness.

2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292, are conflicting decisions BEFORE final decision in cases involving federal questions at district court an interlocutory decision appealable at the 3d Cir.?

Whether conflicting interlocutory orders from two district court judges violate a pro se litigant's constitutional rights and judicial procedural consistency