No. 24-775

Southern California Edison Company, et al. v. Orange County Transportation Authority

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-01-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response Waived
Tags: fifth-amendment government-taking just-compensation public-transit takings-clause utility-relocation
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment Takings JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause guarantees just compensation when the government forces a privately owned utility to relocate its facilities to make way for a public transit project

Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause guarantees just compensation when the government forces a privately owned utility to relocate its facilities to make way for a public transit project.

Docket Entries

2025-03-03
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-19
Amicus brief of Edison Electric Institute submitted.
2025-02-19
Brief amicus curiae of Edison Electric Institute filed. (Distributed)
2025-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2025.
2025-02-10
Rule 12.6 letter of party interest of Southern California Gas Company received.
2025-02-06
Waiver of Orange County Transportation Authority of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-06
Waiver of right of respondent Orange County Transportation Authority to respond filed.
2025-01-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2025)
2024-11-01
Application (24A437) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 16, 2025.
2024-10-30
Application (24A437) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 17, 2024 to January 16, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Edison Electric Institute
Jonathan Mark LittleBaker Botts L.L.P., Amicus
Jonathan Mark LittleBaker Botts L.L.P., Amicus
Orange County Transportation Authority
David Allen DeBerryWoodruff & Smart, Respondent
David Allen DeBerryWoodruff & Smart, Respondent
Southern California Edison Company
Julian Wing-Kai PoonGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Julian Wing-Kai PoonGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner