No. 24-775
Southern California Edison Company, et al. v. Orange County Transportation Authority
Amici (1)Response Waived
Tags: fifth-amendment government-taking just-compensation public-transit takings-clause utility-relocation
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment Takings JusticiabilityDoctri
FifthAmendment Takings JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause guarantees just compensation when the government forces a privately owned utility to relocate its facilities to make way for a public transit project
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause guarantees just compensation when the government forces a privately owned utility to relocate its facilities to make way for a public transit project.
Docket Entries
2025-03-03
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-19
Amicus brief of Edison Electric Institute submitted.
2025-02-19
Brief amicus curiae of Edison Electric Institute filed. (Distributed)
2025-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2025.
2025-02-10
Rule 12.6 letter of party interest of Southern California Gas Company received.
2025-02-06
Waiver of Orange County Transportation Authority of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-06
Waiver of right of respondent Orange County Transportation Authority to respond filed.
2025-01-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2025)
2024-11-01
Application (24A437) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 16, 2025.
2024-10-30
Application (24A437) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 17, 2024 to January 16, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Edison Electric Institute
Jonathan Mark Little — Baker Botts L.L.P., Amicus
Jonathan Mark Little — Baker Botts L.L.P., Amicus
Orange County Transportation Authority
David Allen DeBerry — Woodruff & Smart, Respondent
David Allen DeBerry — Woodruff & Smart, Respondent
Southern California Edison Company
Julian Wing-Kai Poon — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Julian Wing-Kai Poon — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner