No. 24-780
Tags: constitutional-right criminal-trial defendant-understanding right-to-counsel sentencing-range waiver
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-06-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a valid waiver of the constitutional right to counsel at trial requires that the defendant understood, at the time of the waiver, the 'range of allowable punishments' that may be imposed upon him following a conviction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether a valid waiver of the constitutional right to counsel at trial requires that the defendant underst ood, at the time of the waiver, the “range of allowable punishments” that may be imposed upon him following a conviction .
Docket Entries
2025-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/5/2025.
2025-05-14
Reply of Anthony Blue submitted.
2025-05-14
Reply of petitioner Anthony Blue filed.
2025-05-05
Brief of New York in opposition submitted.
2025-05-05
Brief of respondent New York in opposition filed.
2025-03-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 5, 2025.
2025-03-24
Motion of New York for an extension of time submitted.
2025-03-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 3, 2025 to May 5, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-03-04
Response Requested. (Due April 3, 2025)
2025-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-19
Waiver of New York of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-19
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2025-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2025)
Attorneys
Anthony Blue
Vincent Gregory Levy — Holwell Shuster & Goldberg, LLP, Petitioner
Vincent Gregory Levy — Holwell Shuster & Goldberg, LLP, Petitioner
New York
Steven Chiajon Wu — New York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Steven Chiajon Wu — New York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent