No. 24-798

Kay E. Anderson v. Nebraska

Lower Court: Nebraska
Docketed: 2025-01-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-conviction evidence-suppression fraudulent-misrepresentation search-warrant state-statute
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a party can be convicted of a crime based upon evidence obtained under a search warrant that was declared invalid because it was procured by fraudulent misrepresentations and in violation of a state statute?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether a party can be convicted of a crime based upon evidence obtained under a search warrant that was declared invalid because it was procured by fraudulent misrepresentations and in violation of a state statute ? Did the Nebraska Supreme Court properly interpret the holding in Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco , 387 U.S. 523, 87 S. Ct. 1727, 18 L.Ed.2d 930 (1967) in finding that residents do not have a constitutional right to refuse a request for a warrantless search b efore an inspection warrant may be issued?

Docket Entries

2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent State of Nebraska to respond filed.
2024-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2025)

Attorneys

Kay E Anderson
Diana J. VogtSherrets Bruno & Vogt LLC, Petitioner
Diana J. VogtSherrets Bruno & Vogt LLC, Petitioner
State of Nebraska
Kevin James SlimpOmaha City Prosecutor, Respondent
Kevin James SlimpOmaha City Prosecutor, Respondent