Whether the district court and circuit court improperly applied summary judgment standards and violated constitutional due process rights in a Title VII employment discrimination case involving a qualified Asian-American physics teacher

Qiu the American citizen of the Chinese race and origin was highly Praxis qualified to teach physics being a successful chemistry teacher. Woodford discriminated against Qiu when Qiu applied for the physics teaching position in 2020-2021. Qiu pursued Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 based on her race, color, national origin against Woodford. The district court granted Woodford ’s summary, and the circuit court affirmed it. Questions 1. Can facts be removed from a summary motion under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure? 2. Did the three judges of the instant case and the three judges of Qiu v. Anderson, 23-5888 form unequal protection of laws against the Constitution? Did they violate the Rule of Law? 3. Is the standard McDonnell Douglas framework still applicable when an employer selects one of the two unqualified applicants? 4. Should the applicants ’ qualifications be determined by the description of the job in the job posting? 5. Did the courts violate Qiu ’s Constitutional right to Due Process and equal protection of laws under Amendment XIV? Did the courts violate the Rule of Law? i LIST OF PROCEDURE Wei Qiu v. Board of Education of Woodford County Public Schools, KY, 5:22 cv 00196, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Judgement entered 09/27/23; 59(e) was Denied on 11/21/23. Wei Qiu v. Woodford County, KY Board of Education, 23-6058, U. S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, Judgment entered 07/01/2024; Petition to Rehear was Denied on 08/29/2024 <!