Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether children must retain an attorney to pursue claims in federal court, or whether their parents may instead litigate pro se on their behalf
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Since the Judiciary Act of 1789, all natural persons suing in federal court have held the right to conduct their cases “personally,” i.e., pro se . 28 U.S.C. §1654. Nothing in the statutory text limits that right to those who are at least 18 years old. And, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17 and this Court’s precedents, parents have the authority to initiate litigation on behalf of th eir minor children and to exercise their children’s procedural rights during such litigation. Nevertheless, the Ninth Circuit has adopted a judge-made rule that parents may not conduct pro se litigation on behalf of their children. This puts indigent children in a Catch-22: Sue with counsel, or do not sue at all. I t a l s o c o n f l i c t s w i t h decisions from other courts of appeals that have refused to bar the courthouse doors to minors whose parents cannot afford adequate representation. The question presented is: Whether children must retain an attorney to pursue claims in federal court, or whether their parents may instead litigate pro se on their behalf.
2025-04-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
2025-04-16
Reply of petitioner La Dell Grizzell filed. (Distributed)
2025-04-16
Reply of La Dell Grizzell submitted.
2025-04-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/2/2025.
2025-04-02
Brief of respondents San Elijo Elementary School, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-04-02
Brief of San Elijo Elementary School, et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-03-03
Brief amici curiae of Advancing American Freedom filed.
2025-03-03
Brief amicus curiae of Religious Freedom Institute filed.
2025-03-03
Brief amici curiae of Advancing American Freedom, et al. filed.
2025-03-03
Amicus brief of The Religious Freedom Institute submitted.
2025-02-28
Brief amici curiae of Tammy Fournier, et al. filed.
2025-02-28
Amicus brief of Tammy Fournier, Gretchen Melton and Carmilla Tatel submitted.
2025-02-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 2, 2025 (30-day extension).
2025-02-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 3, 2025 to April 2, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-02-14
Motion of San Elijo Elementary School, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2025-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 3, 2025)
2024-12-17
Application (24A589) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 29, 2025.
2024-12-13
Application (24A589) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 30, 2024 to January 29, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.